I got a great email from the National MS Society the other day: 

email-full

 

Here’s a close up of the text, if the full email is hard to read:

email-text

It drew me in from the very first sentence the the story it told about Channing.  It was a perfect example of a best practice.  A real story, not one littered with facts and tidbits throughout it to try to educate the users.  Even though I have no connect to MS, beyond donating money to a bike ride my brother did for the organization, I formed a connection with the subject of the email.  Later, a colleague of mine articulated why it worked so well - the opening line is something we can all relate to: being in the doctors office and hearing that something is wrong.

It reminded me of the lessons from one of the keynote sessions at the American Marketing Association Symposium for the Marketing of Higher Education, Storytelling as Best Practice.

We’ve got a problem: It’s not that we don’t have good stories to tell. It’s that when we tell our stories we burden them with so much jargon and statistics that they don’t work anymore and become unrecognizable. 

The point here is that most non-profits litter their stories with so much educational information that the actual STORY got lost.  What the National MS Society did here was separate the education from the narrative.  It still had facts and figures…but only gave them to you after they had already sucked  you in.  

Another great thing about this email is that the message is really evergreen - although it was used as an end-of-year email in this case it could really be used year-round.  In tough economic times when organizations are trying to cut their budgets in any way possible, implementing an aggressive email strategy with evergreen messages like this is certainly something to be considered.

I actually think there was one missed opportunity here for the National MS Society - I wanted to know MORE about Channing.  If she had been writing a blog about her life on their website, I would have gone there in an instant.  Email doesn’t allow for a lot of room to tell a story and I don’t think there’s anything wrong with continuing it on the website for users who become particularly engaged.  Of course, included on the blog/website/whatever it is would be consistent calls-to-action to give money to help people like Channing. If I’m engaged with a real person, the odds of my opening my wallet instantly increase.

Well done National MS Society!  I look forward to adopting your strategy in my own work :-)

Like what you read here? Subscribe to this blog through RSS or sign up to receive email updates when new content is posted.