The State of Admissions Websites
Over the past week and a half, I have been on literally hundreds of admissions websites, for schools all over the country. Though I never planned for it to be a formal survey about the state of admissions websites, here are some observations that I made along the way:
Student Blogs are pervasive - Almost every single admissions site I went to had student blogs on it, proving emphatically that we no longer need to spend time convincing those in charge of their value. But there’s a downside to this too - if every site has student blogs, they cease to be special, or a real differentiator. It’s time to acknowledge that blogs are nothing more than a content management system and can be used for a lot more than just student journals. Take a look at the needs of your audience and see what gaps you might be able to fill.
“Become a VIP” - There must have been at least a couple dozen sites with a prominent button for prospective students to “become a VIP” (though it seemed to be mostly a northeast phenomenon). Now, I have no idea what “becoming a VIP” means to each school I saw it on, but here are my two concerns:
- If any old person can “become a VIP” by filling out a form, then it’s probably not really that special.
- If a student is seeing “become a VIP” on more than one admissions website that they’re visiting, they’re probably going to catch on that you’re trying to dupe them.
Prominent “Apply Now” Buttons on home pages - I was pleasantly surprised to find that the majority of home pages (www.college.edu) I visited had prominent “apply” links, sending interested prospects directly to the application. This is a major shift from just a few years ago, when you rarely saw an apply or a request more information link on a college’s home page.
“Future Student” vs. “Prospective Student” - This battle is still raging on, with no clear-cut winning nomenclature on college homepages. I would say it was about a 50/50 split. To me, using “future student” has always seemed a bit presumptuous.
Spotty navigation - Most of the sites I visited were confusing as all hell to navigate, and this is coming from someone who spent four and a half years working on an admissions website! Can you imagine how confusing it is for your audience, who have little to no experience with them? The primary problem seems to be that most of these sites were forced into a content management system without consideration for what would happen when the sites started to grow and expand.
“Meet The Staff” - Now I know all you Directors of Admissions and VPs of Enrollment out there will be shocked by this, but your primary web audience doesn’t care who you are. They care about their counselor - their primary contact. Putting yourself at the top of a “meet the staff” page in a colored box to differentiate yourself from the mere mortals beneath you doesn’t add any value to the site. Also, if you’re going to have a “meet the staff” page, make sure you have contact information on there! A phone number, email address, AIM screen name and a mailing address (yes, your prospects do still need to mail stuff in, like transcripts!).
All the pictures look the same - I think pictures of smiling students are important, but don’t expect the photography on your site to set you apart from another school. It won’t. It all looks the same.
What trends have you seen on admissions websites lately? Leave a comment!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Like what you read here? Subscribe to this blog through RSS or sign up to receive email updates when new content is posted.






January 27th, 2009
Increasingly in Canada you’ll find pathways as a communication and navigation method and video has become a prominent part of most sites, although the video is usually pretty rough.
Portal logins are also very common however the value added for doing so is really lacking across the board.
Nice piece,
N
January 27th, 2009
I’ve never heard of “Become a VIP,” but I’m in the midwest. I’m sure the trend will make it’s way here eventually. The “Meet the Staff” blurb made me laugh out loud.
Ah.. Spotty navigation. Our Web site was based on how our internal structure is organized. Doesn’t work well when the terms — credit, continuing ed, professional dev, personal enrichment and adult ed — seem confusing. What if they just wanna learn Spanish? Prolly one of our biggest issues.
Trends: Virtual tours, chat live, video and like Neil said, portal (sore subject for me).
January 27th, 2009
Karlyn,
I’ve been conducting my own research of some Higher Ed sites lately, and I have to agree hands-down with everything you’ve posted here.
Karlyn,
I’ve been conducting my own research of some Higher Ed sites lately, and I have to agree hands-down, with everything you’ve posted here.
I’ve been throwing around the term “branding” - and as soon as I do so, many folks in Higher Ed tend to grimace and look at me with that, “Oh - he didn’t just say ‘branding’?” look on their face. But really, these PR folks should embrace branding. Now I’m not saying they should create slick, new marketing campaigns that spew out taglines and distilled mission statements. I’m talking about the kind of branding that is ultimately about being genuine. Being genuine is critical when communicating with a core audience. The PR department’s audience wants the real voice of the institution. The audience want the raw integrity - not rehearsed elevator speeches. After all - the audience will be living the institution’s brand once they are students on campus. So it had better be hearing the Real McCoy now! The audience will search for the real voice, and find it. Whether it’s YouTube, Tweets, Facebook, etc.. the will find it. That’s just how these kids are wired. But where will they find it? All too often, not from the PR department. And that is the mistake so many institutions are making. Institutions must focus on being real. Re-tool their PR/marketing efforts for a two-way dialog with their core audience. And through that two-way dialogue, institutions will learn what their true brand really is. I just hope they are ready/willing to listen.
Keep up the good fight,
Ethan
Institutions must focus on being real. Re-tool their PR/marketing efforts for a two-way dialog with their core audience.
January 27th, 2009
all i can say is the most elegant and well designed admissions site i’ve ever seen is http://www.bu.edu/admissions/ which is missing some of the problems you mention.
January 27th, 2009
re: “if every site has student blogs, they cease to be special, or a real differentiator”
Not sure I follow you… What makes them “special” has nothing to do with how many other admission depts are blogging. It’s a glimpse into the life of a student on YOUR campus. That content is what makes the blog special, what differentiates you from the others. To assume that people started blogs just to be first/unique is rather presumptuous.
January 27th, 2009
@Todd - What I mean is if blogs are on every single site, it becomes less and less likely that prospective students will take the time to fully investigate them after a while. Also, though I didn’t investigate the blogs, I’m about 90% certain that if I had, the content of all of them would have looked remarkably similar.
And as one of the first people to start a student blogging program, I can say that doing it to be unique was exactly the point.
January 27th, 2009
I have been doing research as well for several projects and completely agree with you. Rolling together the spotty navigation and the meet the staff, I became increasingly frustrated with websites with no directory. How can you meet the staff if you can’t find the staff?
January 27th, 2009
@karlyn re: “as one of the first people to start a student blogging program, I can say that doing it to be unique was exactly the point.”
That explains why your view is skewed.
January 27th, 2009
@Todd - Not really. As a marketer, you should always be looking for unique ways to articulate your product. You can’t look me in the eyes and honestly say that blogs are the only way to articulate the student experience or that the only way to use blogs in higher ed marketing is student journals. Once that market becomes saturated, it’s time to try something different.
January 27th, 2009
@karlyn - OK, no smiley faces this time… Serious, technology for technologies sake is what I’m hearing. Maybe that’s not what you’re saying, but that’s what I’m hearing.
You said once everyone has a blog, they are no longer special. I disagree, and believe that the “unique” view of blogger is what makes the blog special, not the uniqueness of the tool.
Would you rather be the first one to the party and bring nothing, or show up a little late but bring the most popular dish?
January 27th, 2009
Thanks for the article (found the link through Twitter). I am currently in the beginning stages of redesigning an admissions web site and discovered the same points in my searches. Could you list some examples of what you thought were overall good designs? I will forward this to our director.
January 27th, 2009
Todd, how unique do you really think student journals can be? Unless you’re talking about a really unique school (and most aren’t), they’re going to be basically the same. We might be able to pick out differences, but I guarantee you the average user probably can’t. What you’re failing to do here is see something from your audience’s point of view - if every college website I visit has student blogs on them, I might look at the first, I might look at the second, but by the third, forth and fifth I’ve probably tuned out. Now, that’s not to say that a school can’t come up with a unique direct marketing program for their blogs (directed at people who have opted into their system) but I doubt many schools have that under control.
And who’s saying technology for technologies sake? Have I EVER preached that? In fact, I think I say in the post that a blog is nothing more than a content management system. I’m very much a proponent of the advantages they have but it’s time to start considering them in a different way to help fill gaps in the marketing program. That in no way is using technology for technology’s sake.
Your last analogy doesn’t really fit what we’re talking about, but I’ll take a stab at it - I’d rather be the first one to the party and bring a mundane dish than be the last and bring something totally unique because by the time the last person shows up, no one is hungry any more and no matter how good the dish is, they aren’t going to eat it.
January 27th, 2009
Future vs. Prospective Student Battle:
The usability tests and focus groups I did between 2000-2004 showed that the vast majority of high school students didn’t have a clue what “prospective” meant, that is was largely “internal speak.” And, using “future student” is more positive-outlook-type thinking instead, and perhaps uses a dose of reverse psychology on them too. We’re going to redesign later this year, and I’m planning on sticking with the ‘future students’ lingo.
Blog Battle: @tsand vs @KarlynM:
I see both your points. I’m Switzerland. But I do lean more towards the novelty of having blogs for the sake of blogs is long over. It’s more about the unique content they provide, finding students that will provide this unique content, and will engage the prospective students. Too many student blogs are boring one-way journals.
January 27th, 2009
@Rachel - if everyone is doing it, it ceases to be a novelty. I’m not arguing for their elimination, but lets just not act like they’re cutting edge or an innovation. In regards to prospective vs. future, I wouldn’t use either and just utilize my admissions pages to convey the same information.
January 27th, 2009
Arguing for “cutting-edge” or “innovation” — marketing words, them — undermines an argument for Communicators and story telling.
If I understand Todd and Rachel, they’re arguing that the human voice is the content, not presence of cutting-edge blogging tech itself.
You asked, “How unique do you really think student journals can be?” I’d answer, “As unique as this post!” The attitude is part of the draw.
January 27th, 2009
@Michael - again, I’m not arguing for their elimination. But in my previous experience managing student bloggers (and in reading many other blogs written by students at other institutions), the truly unique post is rare. Also, believe it or not, the the magical land of higher ed, many people do consider blogs to be innovative…they’ve about 10 years behind the times but that doesn’t change the perception.
January 27th, 2009
But I’m complimenting you on your uniqueness of style, and you’re saying there’s nothing unique! How can this be?? How could uniqueness NOT matter to connecting with an audience? The 10,000 blog posts might look undifferentiated, but they might have many dimensions of uniqueness to other readers. The marketer, er, admissions officer, (cough) blogger, prospect, are each going to connect with those 10,000 blog posts in their own way. Who cares if they all look the same to me, as long as I can still read Fred’s TDI Club forums which is the one place with all the best gossip on VW’s turbo-diesel econoboxs. I’m having a hard time agreeing that you get to decide what is unique.
Do we agree that “It’s GREAT that blogging is everywhere!”?
January 27th, 2009
There are some great student blogs. There are also really crappy student blogs. Then there are those in the middle, that may have moments of greatness but border on the mundane most of the time. “I went to class”….”I went to practice”….nothing that really ends up differentiating the institution from competitors. Now, if there’s no differentiator, then what ends up being the deciding point? Price. That has nothing to do with blogs. Also, how does a prospective student find the really great student blogs? It’s like finding a needle in a haystack.
January 27th, 2009
There will someday be blog editors, panning for gold in the stream of posts, finding the good stuff for their organization’s mission, adding their own comments or annotations. Like the magazine editors of yore, without the deadlines or space constraint.
January 27th, 2009
one can only hope
in the meantime, can we at least consider using blogs in a way that isn’t a journal? pretty please?
January 27th, 2009
Oh, yeah. They should be personal magazines. In the ’80s the Media Lab talked about personal magazines, but they were funded by corporations, so they assumed we’d BUY and READ magazines. The dissolution of the publishing industry is happening because we want to MAKE and WRITE our magazines.
January 27th, 2009
My favorite is the fake student blog. It has a picture of the student. However, it has content which reads like the Admissions Office paid the student to write about how great is the school.
In The Long Tail, Chris talks about a case where Chevy had people submit videos for a contest. Some were negative. Chevy didn’t yank those videos. Sales still improved. He tried to go in the direction of confirmation biases didn’t go far enough. Talk about ideology and facts failing to change minds during the election explains it better. When we believe what we want to believe, then contrary information won’t change our minds.
I’m probably weird, but I have Google alerts set up for things of interest to me such as my alma mater. So I see students posting about the school quite a bit. Much of it is negative. Of course, ideology gets in the way.
January 28th, 2009
@Rachel I agree on the prospective vs. future issue. However, we’ve sidestepped it altogether by asking prospects to determine where they are now in their lives - not where they’ll be when they come here. We recruit a lot of transfers and adult students, and they don’t communicate with the same words and in the same ways as traditional students. So we’ve segmented as high school, transfer, adult, and soon to be international and graduate student.
It works for us. I think.
January 29th, 2009
Thanks for reiterating a lot of what you’ve said here. If enough of us say it, maybe they’ll actually start to listen.
Now I doubt it, but hey…one to have hope. Or something.
January 30th, 2009
The issue is that blogs, like any media, become just another form of noise at some point. And, ideally, the blogs should be an insight into authentic student experience, but, as noted earlier, the authenticity of many of these blogs is questionable.
As blogs became more prominent in higher ed, they also became less blog and more spin. I ended up advocating nixing our blogging program because the administration refused to allow commenting and was so anxious about the lack of control that I said there was no way in hell they were going to have any impact. It was just another thing for us to have to manage and our resources were stretched enough already.
February 3rd, 2009
Student blogs tend to be boring. Yes, there are standouts, students who write well or have a perspective most students don’t. But really, most of these bloggers are 17 - 22 with very little experience outside of going to school. They have had very little time to reflect on their education, being still so deeply immersed in it. As a result, as much as I try to impress onto my bloggers that stories are key, not diaries or lists of activities accomplished in the last week, it is a chore to squeeze anything really interesting out. And in all the student blogs I’ve read, that seems to be a common issue.
The question: do blogs attract readers? What do your web stats say? How popular are the blogs? That should be some indication of whether they have any impact at all?
For the purposes of full disclosure, our main blog-containing page ranks #93 among our other pages (placing it behind, among other pages, those for the international student admissions requirements where international students make up a rather small part of the student body), not particularly compelling evidence of success. On the other hand, this has been a difficult year to keep them updated (although no year’s been easy, now that I think of it).
All told, blogging is probably not going away, but it’s no panacea either. Mostly, students don’t read anyway.
So what’s the next cool content delivery vehicle, and what piping hot interactive or multi-media confection will it be bringing?
Guesses . . . ?
February 3rd, 2009
Christian I think another problem is that colleges don’t really market their student blogs (email is dead, right?) so they don’t get traffic on them. They expect that putting them up on the web and hoping people wander across them is enough.
What’s the next thing is always a question we need to ask ourselves, but also how we can use the current technology we have in more interesting ways. I’ll ask again - are student journals REALLY the only way we can use blogs? REALLY??? (Hint: In 2007 I launched a “new students blog” at my last school that had nothing to do with chronicling student life and it was one of the most popular pages on the admissions site for the span of its “life”)
February 3rd, 2009
Thanks, Karlyn, for your hint, but what WAS the “new student blog”?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Also, while we do promote our blogs (they are on the front page, after all), that’s not what most of our readers are looking for. Now, if we did a financial aid blog, I imagine that could be big, BIG, I tell you.
February 3rd, 2009
In a blog post for a later date, my friend
My marketing, I’m not necessarily saying on your website - I’m saying by email. Send them email driving them to a page on your website (in a compelling way) and they will come.
February 3rd, 2009
[...] Blogs for Admissions Feb.03, 2009 in Admissions, Blogging, Marketing In my post last week about the state of admissions websites, I took quite a bit of flack for the mere suggestion that maybe…just MAYBE…blogs could [...]
February 3rd, 2009
Become a VIP… But whatever you do, don’t request information. We don’t provide a link for that!
The Become a VIP “feature” is a common .edu feature. Not exactly special to the student.
It is (typically) a Hobson’s product.
Look at all the schools that offer it:
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=become+a+vip+site%3A.edu&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=become+a+vip+site%3A.edu&fp=3WTwdsC3GPc
Or, to get at those schools a different way:
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=site%3Aemt.askadmissions.net&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=site%3Aemt.askadmissions.net&fp=3WTwdsC3GPc
Call me a cynic, but I still don’t buy the concept that students prefer personalized college Web sites based on their interests, or log back into them very often. And I know that colleges aren’t good at keeping the content current based on what I’ve seen.
But I am convinced Hobsons is making some good money off of the concept
February 4th, 2009
Future vs. Prospective is really an academic debate. High school seems to be better. How about: New Students? Or if you really want outside the box, how about a label like: Getting In
February 4th, 2009
Okay, I’m totally on board with what you’re saying re: using blogs for other purposes. I’ve been pushing for that here at BCIT for awhile now.
We’ve had student blogs (http://www.bcit.ca/mylife) for three years now, but I think we could get a lot of mileage out of the technology as a tool for the Admissions group, our Continuing Ed department and Financial Aid in particular. Residence could also use it.
The key is getting some people to stop thinking of their sites as brochures, and dedicating resources to regular updates and interactions with the students. Many are loathe to do that.
February 5th, 2009
@Dave I hear that. Couldn’t agree more with your last point. But are you talking about how blogs can be used in a different form, or just in different areas?